I believe that we should use a
combination of strategies to measure and assess children. Bloom’s taxonomy should be considered when
creating real life situations that students work to solve so that children
learn to develop their critical thinking skills instead of regurgitating
information learned about a particular topic. Can students apply what they have learned to
a new situation? Can they analyze data
in order to come to their own conclusions about that data? Can they evaluate the information they have
and apply it to a new situation or create a new way of doing something as a
result of reviewing the information given?
These are life skills that the children need to be able to do in order
to be successful in life.
There are certain basic skills that need to be assessed such as basic math operations, but it can be done through practical application so that children are able to solve real life problems as they arise. Assessing children’s understanding of their native language is also necessary in order to be able to effectively communicate.
Depending
upon the topic, children can choose from a variety of ways to present what they
have learned. Gardner’s multiple
intelligences would be used to create a rubric to determine the level to which
the child has mastered a particular skill or skill set. This in conjunction with standardized testing,
which is required, gives a clearer picture of what the child actually
knows. Some children freeze when they
hear the word “test” so giving them other opportunities to demonstrate their
knowledge is very important.
In
Sweden, children begin school at age 7 after completing kindergarten. The objectives that they hope children will
attain are as follows:
·
Develop curiousity and a desire to learn
·
Develop their own way of learning
·
Develop confidence in their own ability
·
Learn to listen, discuss and respond
·
Use knowledge as a tool to form and test
asssumptions as well as solve problems (Jackson, 2012)
Children do self-assessments of tasks using a four point
scale: “fail, pass, pass with distinction, and pass with special distinction.” (Berkeley, 2010).
National assessments are conducted in 5th and 9th
years of school. Teachers can choose
from a variety of test questions and change the test according to what has been
taught. Then the teachers grade the standardized
tests. This has caused some controversy
because of the variance in test scores. Students can also choose to use technology,
illustrations or dramatizations to demonstrate their knowledge.
All of us are different and learn in different ways. We can probably tell you what our preference
is when it comes to learning.
Restricting that assessment to the mode of standardized testing does not
allow for all children to excel if they know the material.
References:
Jackson, A. (2010, Feb. 10). Sweden: The Answer Isn’t A.B.B.A. Education Week. Retrieved from
blogs.edweek.org/edweek/global.learning/2012/01sweden_the_answer_isnt_a_b_b_a.html.
Berkeley Education. (2010). Sweden. Retrieved from
bearcenter.berkeley.edu/measurement/pubs/apG51.pdf.
Steele, S. (2004, July 23). Ways to assess student learning. Retrieved
from
ww.indiana.edu/~theme/elementary/assessmentoptions.htm.
I agree with you about children having different learning styles. Through summative assessments and a curriculum that builds upon a developmental continuum, children are offered a developmentally appropriate assessment tool that really reflects their strengths and areas for continued progress.
ReplyDeleteHi Carol, I agree that students need a combination of assessments to measure their progress. I enjoyed reading about schools in Sweden and their four point scale; I also found it very interesting that the teachers chose the test question for the national test and that they graded them also. I totally agree that we all have different learning styles. Thank you for sharing.
ReplyDeleteHi Carol, I am in total agreement with you re the use of various assessments. I like the fact that you focused on assessing higher level skills like critical thinking, analyzing data and applying knowledge to new situations. These are certainly important skills. I enjoyed reading about schools in Sweden. Interesting indeed that teachers get to choose the questions and also mark the tests. Thanks for sharing.
ReplyDeleteHi Carol, great post! I've learned that in Sweden's neighbor Finland, teacher designed assessments take on many forms as well. I really like your own ideas about how better to assess the learning of children. Children put so much time and energy into memorizing vast amounts of isolated facts. I cringe when I see my youngest (7th grade) memorizing material for science. She utilizes techniques that admirably she has come up with on her own to memorize facts, but it leaves no time for any kind of investigation of the material and allows for little to no retention of the material. If I "interfere" with her studies, she explains to me that she does not have time to "learn it". Or she tells me, "That's not what the test is going to ask." She has to spend the time she has memorizing the material, or she won't do well on the test. I tell her with a smile, good luck on the test. In my mind I'm thinking... maybe you can actually learn that material when you get to college.
DeleteDear Carol,
ReplyDeleteI just wanted to take a minute to thank you for the information you have shared over the past 8 weeks. I have learned so much from you and have been inspired by you in many ways. Your blog posts and weekly discussions have always given me something to think about and reflect on. I look forward to sharing more classes with you in the near future.
Good luck on your grand adventure of life,
Melinda